NCOM NEWS BYTES
compiled and edited by Bill Bish - Juner 2001
National Coalition of Motorcyclists (NCOM)
TEXAS GOVERNOR VETOES BIKER ANTI-DISCRIMINATION BILL Despite
an outstanding lobbying effort by the Texas Motorcycle Rights
Association and the four Confederations of Clubs of Texas, and
in spite of near unanimous passage in the Texas Legislature, Governor
Rick Perry vetoed landmark legislation that would have made Texas
the second state to make it illegal to discriminate against motorcycle
riders. Minnesota passed the nation's first biker equal access
law in 1998.
Although House Bill 259 received only two "No" votes
in the House of Representatives and passed the Senate unanimously,
Perry vetoed the bill with no explanation at the midnight hour
on June 17th, the last day to sign or veto bills.
"We'll just have to get a new governor and run another
bill through next session," said Sputnik, Chairman of the
TMRA-II and member of the National Coalition of Motorcyclists'
Legislative Task Force. "I just sent a letter to Governor
Perry promising him that, 'You'll remember this bill every day
of your upcoming campaign,' because Texas bikers WILL elect a
new governor in November!" Perry succeeded former Governor
George W. Bush to fulfill his term of office after Bush resigned
to run for President, and will stand election this fall.
JW Rock, Chairman of the Central Texas Confederation of Clubs
and Liaison for all Texas Confederations added, "We decided
even before the governor's veto that we'd keep coming back with
this bill until we get it passed. Since there were only two "No"
votes against our bill, we already know that those legislators
won't be back in office next session and we'll have a new governor
in office."
OREGON RIDERS WIN RIGHT TO PUMP THEIR OWN GAS Oregon Governor
John Kitzhaber signed House Bill 3885 into law on June 11, 2001,
which gives motorcyclists the choice of fueling their own bikes.
Oregon and New Jersey are the only two states which prohibit "Self-Serve"
gas pumps, and now motorcycles will be the only class of vehicle
allowed to actually dispense fuel into their own tanks in Oregon,
effective January 1, 2002.
HB3885 passed with very few opposed in both the House and Senate,
and most lawmakers agreed with BikePAC and Oregon's motorcyclists
that the special fueling requirements of various bikes made the
rider the expert at fuel dispensing. This bill also removes a
liability for gas station owners who permitted the common sense
practice of allowing bikers to fuel their own.
A spokesman in the House Speaker's office also complimented
HB3885 as very well-written and readable. Thanks go out to Teresa
Hepker, BikePAC Legislative Director, who wrote most of the language,
Oregon State Representative Bruce Starr, who sponsored the bill,
and also Lyle, Iris, Cherie and David, the BikePAC lobbying team.
In addition, several concerned riders such as Pat Ryan, James
Brassfield, Wayne Schumacher and State Rep. Carl Wilson gave good
thorough testimony in the House Transportation Committee.
According to Oregon A.I.M. (Aid to Injured Motorcyclists) Attorney
Sam Hochberg, who was one of the first to draw statewide attention
to this predicament, "It's about time. It just ticks you
off when you roll up to a pump and they insist you can't pump
your own gas into your own motorcycle! When the state fire marshall
went on a little tear on this, and tried a crackdown to enforce
the law against bikes, then we started seeing signs on pumps that
specifically said that they refused to let bikers pump their own.
The fire marshall's office wasn't much help when I contacted them
about it, so I'm glad the state legislature had the good sense
to change the law, and I'm glad we have BikePAC and ABATE to help
them see the light!"
Ken Ray, Executive Director of BikePAC noted, "There are
literally hundreds of groups at the state capitol lobbying for
this and that. Most of them get a few things they want, but nobody
gets all they want. Very few of them manage to get a bill passed
every single session that benefits their groups. There are groups
who spend hundreds of thousands of dollars a year and don't get
as much accomplished as BikePAC does with donations and volunteer
activists. I'm proud of the motorcyclists of Oregon for making
a difference."
JUSTICE FINALLY PREVAILS FOR KANSAS BIKER On April 13, 2001,
the Kansas Court of Appeals handed down its second decision overturning
the illegal sentence of biker Richard B. Aikman for the crime
of wearing a belt buckle.
In 1997, Aikman was charged with various drug charges resulting
from information obtained from a confidential informant and from
a raid of his home in Natoma, Kansas. The confidential informant
provided authorities untruthful information about Aikman being
involved in the distribution of methamphetamine in exchange for
leniency in charges he faced. He also informed authorities that
the biker had a cache of weapons in his home, which included automatic
weapons.
Law enforcement officials in full riot gear and aided with
an armed personnel carrier burst into Aikman's home. No weapons
were discovered, other than some shotguns used for hunting. However,
a small quantity of marijuana and rolling papers were found. Despite
finding no methamphetamine or evidence of distribution, Aikman
was charged with several serious drug charges. He pled guilty
to possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia.
The conviction for possession of marijuana was Aikman's second,
which under Kansas law constitutes a felony.
Sentencing in Kansas is controlled by the Kansas Sentencing
Guidelines.
Aikman fell under the portion of the sentencing grid which
specified probation, and unless factors justify a more harsh sentence
the judge must impose the probation. During the original sentencing,
the sentencing judge remarked on a belt buckle he had observed
Aikman wear to court when he had entered his plea. The belt buckle
had the words "Sons of Silence" upon it. Acting on his
own initiative, the judge announced he was going to depart on
Aikman's sentence because Aikman had displayed evidence of gang
affiliation by his belt buckle. There had been no allegations
that the crimes for which Aikman was being sentenced had anything
to do with involvement with the Sons of Silence Motorcycle Club.
There was no evidence that Aikman was a member of the Sons of
Silence M/C, or that the Sons of Silence even existed. The judge
gave Aikman probation for the possession felony but sentenced
him to one year in county jail for the misdemeanor paraphernalia
charge.
Aikman appealed his conviction through Kansas A.I.M. Attorney
Keith Renner, who also serves as legal counsel to the Confederation
of Clubs of Kansas. The Kansas Court of Appeals overturned the
conviction and remanded the matter to the District Court for resentencing.
However, once again the sentencing judge (the same judge) brought
up the belt buckle issue. He also made several attempts to force
Aikman to waive his Fifth Amendment rights by indicating that
if Aikman would disavow any interest in the Sons of Silence he
would be treated lenient. However, if he failed to disavow, the
judge made it abundantly clear that he would be treated harshly.
Aikman, however, stood his ground and refused to be bullied.
The judge not only sentenced him to one year in county jail
on the misdemeanor, but sentenced him to one year in a state penitentiary
for the felony. The matter was once again appealed.
The issues in the second appeal were substantially the same
as in the first. Aikman claimed that his First Amendment rights
to freedom of speech and association were violated by the court's
consideration of an article of wearing apparel professing support
of a group, and that the court had violated his Fifth Amendment
right to avoid self-incrimination for punishing Aikman for failing
to disavow interest in the Sons of Silence.
In very strong language, the Kansas Court of Appeals once again
overturned the sentences and remanded the matter to the District
Court for resentencing under the instructions provided. The Court
of Appeals ruled that before the court can consider an issue relating
to alleged gang membership "[e]vidence of gang membership
must be relevant to the issues presented at sentencing,"
that the trial court violated Aikman's Fifth Amendment rights
by punishing him for refusing to make any comment about membership
in the Sons of Silence, and that "[a] defendant's apparel
at sentencing and his or her failure to disavow gang membership
do not constitute substantial and compelling reasons to support
a departure sentence."
The matter has not yet been returned to the District Court,
but Renner is hopeful that his client will be released from court
supervision instead of being placed on probation since he has
been under court supervision for over three years while this matter
was on appeal. The local county attorney, Paul Gregory, has indicated
to Renner that he will not opposed a motion for Aikman's release
from court supervision since he has been supervised since this
matter was first appealed.
Richard Aikman's bravery in the face of the unwarranted hostility
from the sentencing court as well as A.I.M. Attorney Keith Renner's
dedication to the cause of freedom and justice have resulted in
very favorable law in Kansas regarding how a sentencing court
can view an individual's display of apparel supportive of motorcycle
clubs. Renner stated, "I am very proud of Rick. It took a
lot of courage to stand up for his rights and engage the trial
court in a fight when he knew he was very likely to appear before
the same judge at re-sentencing. But that is the kind of bravery
and dedication to our rights and freedom that made this country
strong, and that is the only kind of action that is going to save
this country from itself."
QUOTE OF THE DAY: "A little government and a little luck
are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them."
P.J. O'Rourke